|
|
|
|
| If Ignorance Is Bliss.....
Then Surely It Must Be Folly To Be Wise!"If ignorance is truly bliss, then why do so many Americans need Prozac?" I'm starting to blog again. However I will ruffle some feathers so if it pisses you off so be it, and if you have something constructive to add do so. If you just want to be bitchy then be forewarned. It's just a button push away from blogville to banville.
Now if you're wondering why so many posts on January 12, 2007, read just pissed off at Aff
Come See
Blog World
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russians Ask - Is Minite Rice Just plain Stupid, or just plain BLACK
|
Posted:Aug 16, 2008 3:04 pm
Last Updated:Aug 17, 2008 4:14 am
2180 Views
|
Has the US Secretary of State got her cassette stuck? For a week now she has been reiterating the same phrase "Russian forces must leave Georgia now" and for a week now the world has been informed of Georgian war crimes against Russians in Ossetia. The war crimes happened, the Russians call the shots now, Ms. Rice. Like it or lump it.
Is Condoleeza Rice stupid? OK her boss is, we all know that and that's why nobody pays any attention to what he says or if they do, it is to have a good laugh at how such an imbecile could supposedly rule the roost in Washington (when everyone knows it is Cheney and his energy and arms lobbies). So Bush gets a discount, like the uncle that farts at family dinners, like the retarded nephew who belches swearwords after his third litre of Coke, like the simpleton that sits outside the church on Sundays begging for money informing everyone that he is an astronaut on Thursday afternoons.
Is Condoleeza Rice stupid? She claims to be a Russian expert but her command of the language was recently exposed as being basic/ elementary level on a Russian radio programme, just as her grasp of what is going on in Russia today seems beneath the informed blogger level.
Is Condoleeza Rice stupid? How can this female purport to broker events between an evil regime in Tblisi supported by her own evil regime in Washington, and Russia, while not mentioning one single time the war crimes committed by Georgia against Russian peacekeepers and civilians?
So we come to the conclusion that she is either stupid, or incompetent, or downright evil. If she didn't know about Georgia's war crimes, when everyone else did, she is incompetent (as she proved as National Security Advisor during 9/11). If she knows about the war crimes and fails to mention them, as Secretary of State, she is plain stupid and if she purposefully covers them up, maybe because her own armed forces were involved, then she is one evil piece of work, as many of us suspected all along.
Is Condoleeza Rice stupid?
Or incompetent?
Or just plain evil?
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
Ongoing Idiocy
|
Posted:Aug 5, 2008 11:20 am
Last Updated:May 25, 2024 9:46 pm
2263 Views
|
Reason will not defeat faith because faith is irrational, and rational thought cannot defeat propaganda if people cannot tell the difference between the two. This is the cornerstone and foundation of the ongoing "Intelligent Design" movement in the United States. There is no controversy concerning the validity of biological evolution as an explanation for life on earth, but still "controversy" is claimed by those such as the Discovery Institute who either do not wish or cannot understand this. There is no question as to the origins of life (life is the consequent of biological evolution) although the story is incomplete. But, the incompleteness of our knowledge concerning the origins of life is not a weakness: it is the nature of what we call knowledge. All of this is the case, but is of no consequent. What is of consequent is the quality of life that we have.
Science, entailing the scientific method, has given us the technology, the ability to understand, and the capability to further broaden the quality of life that we have as human beings. While it can be argued that science has brought upon humanity some of the worst atrocities in human history, it is not science that can be blamed. Rather, it is the use of science by people; people motivated by certain ideologies, military or otherwise, that bear the burden of human evil. Every cure, every agricultural advance, every cultural paradigm, every engineering feat, every piece and parcel of understanding that we have of the world and the universe we live in, every perspective pertaining to human knowledge can be linked to science.
All of this has not been gotten freely. This sort of progress has been the consequent of curious minds not hindered by any faith-ideology, but spurred on by the human need to understand. All of this has been made possible by science, an imperfect and by far un-finished symphony that inevitably will have no end. This is the nature of that thing we call "science". Its power is that it is open-ended, but the cost of that open-endedness is uncertainty.
The scientific method works. It works consistently, over time and has defeated all other alternatives in regard to defining human knowledge, or what has been defined as "true, justified belief". The scientific method is a system that must remain open to all, especially scientific peers as well as those that have valid alternative theories. The scientific method relies upon freedom of thought and freedom of speech. It relies on the ability of theories to be replicated and hypotheses to be tested: not by a few, but by all.
Science is a process not simply of chemical tests and physical properties to be compared, data to be propagated and syncopated. Science is a process of free thought. These things together make up science. The cost of this kind of free thought is that a process must be devised to even the playing field for all hypotheses. This means that all hypotheses must give themselves freely to the process of the scientific method, and if they fail: they must admit failure. Those hypotheses that defeat alternative theories, not based on tradition, wishful thinking, repetition, or other fallacies, are to be held until they too fail, if it is possible for them to be defeated at all. This is science, and the method of science has given us every piece of knowledge that we have.
Faith can give us hypotheses but it cannot give us knowledge. Faith in any form, put any way, re-configured to seem one way or the other, propagandized, called by other names, politicized or propagated by personal motivations cannot give us knowledge. While faith can give rise to hope, and hope can give rise to hypotheses, those hypotheses (to even be considered knowledge) must adhere to some consistent, repeatable, testable, and predicable method that is open to all and able to be peer-reviewed over and over again. Faith does not meet these criteria, and neither do the products of faith. One of the greatest scientists in human history, repeatedly misused and misquoted by many in their quest to lessen the quality of life by redefining the very thing that creates that quality, admittedly made the mistake of relying on faith to explain science and eventually admitted his mistake and even apologized for it. Faith is not science and does not lead to any thing scientific other than the individual hope that science will unfold more understanding and positive consequences for humanity in the end.
There are a few vocal groups, mainly in the United States, that continually call "foul" concerning the scientific method based on the grounds of free speech and freedom of thought. These groups claim that science is "biased" and as a result limits their freedom to speak or think the way that they desire to speak or think. This is their right and privilege. Because of this right and privilege and because they have faith in what they claim and think, they claim that the moral (the right) thing to do is to redefine science to allow their claims and thoughts to be considered scientific. This is the basis of their argument. However, to allow these claims and thoughts to be considered scientific, the scientific method would have to be changed. It would have to be changed in order to include hypotheses (as scientific) that cannot be tested, that have failed against alternative theories, are not consistent, and have failed to result in any predictable fashion, save one: violence. In stating these things I am not claiming that these people cannot say what they want, believe what they want and that they have a right and privilege to do so. What I am saying is: not every belief, thought, proposition, claim, and hope is scientific. To change the scientific method, as these people claim need doing, would allow, would demand that every belief, thought, proposition, claim, and hope is scientific. This is not rhetorical reply, but simply a reality of the conclusion of such arguments. These would not only diminish the quality of science and its ability to be consistent, predicable, and justifiably true, but would destroy the ability of science to be considered trustworthy at all.
The people who want to redefine science to include their hypothesis, even after it has failed consistently to produce any qualitative result, scientific or otherwise, are asking nothing less than to degrade the quality of human knowledge to the extent that it is simply defined as "belief". This will have predictable results that are very negative qualitatively speaking but highly positive quantitatively speaking. It will allow all beliefs to be considered scientific, and will diminish the power that science has proven itself to have. This power will be diminished to the extent that science becomes as meaningless as many of the beliefs that humans have held over eons. These groups claim that certain hypotheses, mainly "intelligent design", are scientific but have failed consistently to produce a single sentence of scientific data to back up their claim. Instead, they rely on propaganda, politics, and poorly made media mechanizations to bolster their pathetic pleas (please pardon my prolonged plethora of 'P' words).
As stated earlier, all of this is of no consequent if reason and rationality are unable to defeat faith, which (unfortunately seems to be the case). The continued defiance and refusal of people of faith to use reason and rationality, the continued empty arguments that they offer, and the continued politicization of scientific definitions will eventually result in science and good scientists being blamed for being elitists and intelligently unfair. It causes popular confusion and as a result, greater degrees of apathy. What is of consequent, concerning this prolonged attack on the scientific method is that human knowledge will be lessened, dumbed down as it were, to the extent that science becomes meaningless and all opinions become equally deserving of respect. From those who believe the world is flat, to those who believe that the universe rests upon the backs of an infinite pile of turtles, to those who believe that 2+3=5, to those who believe that there is a bearded white man who lives on the North Pole, to those who believe that human beings have no influence on the environment, to those who believe in creators of the universe will all have to be given equal consideration: it all becomes "scientific". The imagination is a wonderful thing, many times leading to scientific truths, but by itself is not scientific. Of course, this is of no consequent if those who do not know the difference between science and imagination will not learn the difference. Instead, there will only be this ongoing idiocy.
|
|
|
1
comment
|
|
What We have Become
|
Posted:Jul 26, 2008 3:19 pm
Last Updated:Jul 30, 2008 3:28 am
2231 Views
|
Some day in the not-too-distant future, someone will pen a book called Who Wrecked America ? If the book is honest, fingers will be pointed at the crooks and liars in Washington DC and Wall Street, at lobbyists (pimps) and Congressmen (whores), at bankers and war toy makers, at AIPAC and PNAC, at presidents, executives and generals.
Doubtful that anyone will conclude that Iran had much to do with the destruction of America . Although today Iran remains in the gunsights of the master criminals in DC, that distant land does less damage to America than a handful of high American officials. Truthfully, I feel more threatened by Bush and Bolton , by Barack and Barak, by McCain and Cheney and Pelosi, than anyone in Iran .
Nukes or no nukes, Iran threatens me less than the Fed, Congress, the US media or the president.
When the history of the late, great nation known as America is written, our own homegrown jackals will be rightly blamed for the destruction. Forgotten will be the nineteen G-string jihadists with their Korans and boxcutters. If the history books are honest and the historians adroit, the blame will lie less with the Taliban and more with the Ivy League educated in their tailored suits and power ties.
Who knew the first US president with an MBA could wield so much destructive power? Maybe an MBA stands for Master of Bankrupting America. Certainly someone should revoke the charter of the university that bestowed an MBA on George W. Bush.
More to blame than any US president, Congress sanctions, and has always permitted, the wholesale destruction of the nation. Perhaps the rich remain loyal to the rich alone. Indeed, a majority of Americans do not even know that Congress allowed the creation of the Federal Reserve. Congress votes to allow US presidents wholesale destructive powers. Congress writes the checks that allow worldwide US imperialism, funding dictators, toppling democracies, while bankrupting America . Congress shuns its sworn duty, to protect and preserve the Constitution and the country, every step of the way. Indeed, as I write this, Congress is weighing more war power measures, called House Resolution 362, giving the president even more destructive powers. Even while America collapses like WTC-7, Congress will find ways to add to the rubble pile. As Doug Thompson wrote years ago: "Nobody's life, liberty or property is safe while Congress is in session."
The American media certainly threatens me far more than Iran . Covert threat rather than overt. By continuously spreading false propaganda for a series of profitable yet fraudulent wars, the US mainstream media does as much or more to wreck this country than any US president. Pundits lament that fewer Americans read the newspaper anymore. Critic Rick Shenkman calls us woodenheaded or boneheaded for our ignorance but fails to note a far more serious form of American ignorance called subtle brainwashing. By selectively reporting and slanting the "news," the corporate-owned US media is no different than a cabal of mullahs bent on controlling the behavior and opinion of the populace.
Georges Santana wrote: "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." To that I would add, those who profit from the past and present are determined to control the future. Consider: This so-called gas shortage and the collective short-sightedness of our so-called leaders seems altogether too planned, too convenient. Ask yourself this question: In the wake of another attack, provocation or terror strike, would the American people be more or less controllable without a steady supply of gas? Would the American people be more or less willing and able to assemble? Would they have the means or money to drive to Washington DC to protest? Without a steady supply of gasoline, and thus without food, without work, would the American people be MORE OR LESS at the mercy of their leaders to provide it?
Those who threaten my health or well-being, endangering those I love and destroying both law and land, pretend to act for my benefit. THEY DO NOT. I never voted for them, nor do I support them in any way in their duplicitous and diabolical agenda.
|
|
|
1
comment
|
|
Dept of Homeland Insecurity
|
Posted:Jul 9, 2008 12:50 pm
Last Updated:Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
2319 Views
|
Stranger and Stranger
Last night a strange thing happened, my phone rang, whats so strange about having your phone ring you might well ask?
Well for most people it would not be at all strange to have their phone ring, but I ain't most people.
Firstly I'm on or at least I was on vacation at the lake which is some 550 miles from home base, so far nothing weird. Now the phone I use here is a Sat Phone and only Five people have access to the number, one of which is my next door neighbor who is authorized to use it only in emergency (as in fire and such).
So at any rate I get this call from someone I don't know asking me to come home so that he can talk to me about something important. The first thing I ask is who the hell he is and how the hell did he get my number? The first thing he says is that he got the number from my neighbor as he had been at my house and found no one at home. So again I ask him who the hell he is and he gives me his name and tells me that we are old friends and he needs me to do him a favor.
First I tell him that I don't have many friends and that I remember the ones that I DO have and I don't fucking remember him so we are NOT old friends. Then again I ask what the hell he wants and he says that he would just as soon not talk about it on the phone. I say TUFF, talk or I'm hanging up. So he tells me that he wants to go to Kansas I say Go, he says that he can't as he has a criminal record and is not allowed into the US.
I ask him again what the fuck he wants with me?
Then he tells me that some people in town had told him that I might be able to help him out in this regard as my land borders the US. I say WHAT! like you want me to wetback you into the fucking US? he says "ehem well sorta yeah", I say "Well ehem sorta your shit outa fucking luck at this end sunshine". Like firstly I ain't in the Wetback business second I'm on vacation and third I'm gonna be to busy killing my fucking neighbor for giving out this God Damn number to be bothering with smuggling you across the God damn river.
With this I hung up.
So I gets to thinking "what the hells going on here?" all this really stinks. What to do? what to do?,
Now I know that I am not well thought of in the US (being Persona Non Grata there an all) but there really is fuck all they can do about the things that I wright about the US on other websites, as long as I keep my nose clean at home, I say Fuckem. However if I were to do something STUPID like smuggling an ILLEGAL across the border that would be bad and cause for me to pay a visit to the GITMO Hotel. Not good.
So I made a few calls of my own and put out a few feelers to find out just who this asshole is and it turns out that he is sort of who he says he is by name at rate and it just pisses me off to no end that this asshole tried to involve me in this little scam.
So now it's time to go home and take care of some business. Long drive home, like all fucking night and I'm pissed.
This is where it gets really stupid.
I decide to do some cover my ass stuff just in case this asshole uses my land to cross the border and gets caught. Then I have questions to answer and that I don't need.
So I try to find the number for US Customs and Immigration,(no luck) One might think that with all of the ARABS hot footing it across the Canadian border they might have a number to call.
So now I call Canadian Customs and ask them if they have a number for the US Customs, they ask why? I tell them that I want to invade the US but I thought that it was only descent to call first,(Hardee har har, joke not well taken). Now I have to explain why I need the fucking number.
They give a Number.
I dial the number.
The message is as follows, the number you have dialed is not available from your location. (WTF)
So I call Canadian Customs again and tell them Neat Trick, now give a number that works, They ask why, I tell them , they say thats it has been an on going problem even with them to get a Number for US Customs that works(insert eye roll here). They do however give me another number to call. ( it don't work either)Go figure.
I call them back and ask them if perhaps they (that is Canadian customs) can run across the road to US Customs and ask them to call me. Oh no sir I'm afraid that it doesn't work that way, I ask WTF have you all been banned from entry into the US? They say no and don't be silly, I say it ain't me thats being silly for fuck sakes. They then tell me that perhaps I should just drive to the nearest Border Crossing and tell them in person. With that I hung up the phone.
Aha Idea, check the web, no good no number,what to do? Aha Second Idea, I call the bar in Pembina North Dakota 50 miles from here and ask the Barman if by any chance he would know the number for the US Customs office which is just down the street from his bar? he says yes and why? I say never mind, could he just call them and ask them to call me as it was a matter of international importance.
He says Yup. I give him my number and hang up.
Not two minutes later they call me and ask me whats up and why are they calling me? I tell them cause like I can't fucking well call them from Canada cause like they haven't payed their phone bills or something. They can't believe it.
I tell them what has happened and they ask if I know who this fellow is and his name. I tell them I have no idea as to who he is but that I do have his name. Bells go off and they tell me that they have known about this fellow for quite some time, then of course come the questions. I tell the good fellow that I really don't give a frogs ass if this bastard crosses the border I just want it to be known that I have had nothing to do with it when he gets caught, and sent to Colorado.
So now he tells me that they have wanted to nail this shit for a long time for drug smuggling and if I would mind if he sent some undercover R.C.M.Ps as he shares an office with them, over to my place to talk to me about it.
I couldn't help but laugh out loud, He asked what was so funny? and I told him the comment about the undercover narcs. he says oh you would never know that they are R.C.M.Ps as they look like real dirt bags. I say they look that way cause they are real dirt bags and that they can be spotted from across the street. Hell I can spot a narc with one eye closed their so transparent. He says no matter could they please come over and talk to me, I say sure as they already know where I live as they tend to drive by often enough in their ghost car( Yuh know the one with the big white sheet over it)
Now he tells me how glad he is that I called and that if this leads to an arrest I might well receive a reward for my services. I tell him that I would have called sooner if they had a God Damn number that worked(Sheeeesh) And that they can keep the money and use it to buy G W Bush a fucking straight jacket.(again joke not well taken)
Anyways this dear fellow gave me a special number that he said he would personally guarantee would work 24/7 should I ever need to call again.
Not only that he also gave me his Home Phone number to call anytime 24/7. Lord me bad, I've got a hot line to US Customs, not even Canadian customs seems to have that.
|
|
|
1
comment
|
|
Railroad tracks... and Horses Asses
|
Posted:Jul 5, 2008 11:22 pm
Last Updated:Jul 8, 2008 2:28 am
2402 Views
|
The US standard railroad gauge (distance between the rails) is 4 feet, 8.5 inches. That's an exceedingly odd number.
Why was that gauge used? Because that's the way they built them in England, and English expatriates built the US railroads.
Why did the English build them like that? Because the first rail lines were built by the same people who built the pre-railroad tramways, and that's the gauge they used.
Why did 'they' use that gauge then? Because the people who built the tramways used the same jigs and tools that they used for building wagons, which used that wheel spacing.
Why did the wagons have that particular odd wheel spacing? Well, if they tried to u se any other spacing, the wagon wheels would break on some of the old, long distance roads in England , because that's the spacing of the wheel ruts.
So who built those old rutted roads? Imperial Rome built the first long distance roads in Europe (and England ) for their legions. The roads have been used ever since.
And the ruts in the roads? Roman war chariots formed the initial ruts, which everyone else had to match for fear of destroying their wagon wheels. Since the chariots were made for Imperial Rome , they were all alike in the matter of wheel spacing. Therefore, the United States standard railroad gauge of 4 feet, 8.5 inches is derived from the original specifications for an Imperial Roman war chariot. Bureaucracies live forever.
So the next time you are handed a Specification/ Procedure/Process and wonder 'What 's ass came up with it?' you may be exactly right. Imperial Roman army chariots were made just wide enough to accommodate the rear ends of two war horses. (Two horses' asses.) Now, the twist to the story:
When you see a Space Shuttle sitting on its launch pad, there are two big booster rockets attached to the sides of the main fuel tank. These are solid rocket bo osters, or SRBs. The SRBs are made by Thiokol at their factory in Utah . The engineers who designed the SRBs would have preferred to make them a bit fatter, but the SRBs had to be shipped by train from the factory to the launch site. The railroad line from the factory happens to run through a tunnel in the mountains, and the SRBs had to fit through that tunnel. The tunnel is slightly wider than the railroad track, and the railroad track, as you now know, is about as wide as two horses' behinds.
So, a major Space Shuttle design feature of what is arguably the world's most advanced transportation system was determined over two thousand years ago by the width of a 's ass. And you thought being a 's ass wasn't important? Ancient 's asses control almost everything....and CURRENT Horses Asses are controlling everything else!
|
|
|
2
Comments
|
|
Baracknophobia
|
Posted:Jun 27, 2008 5:48 pm
Last Updated:Jun 28, 2008 7:16 am
2489 Views
|
Even the most ardent of Barack Obama's supporters generally will confess to a small, nagging (dare I say niggling?) doubt about the object of their ardor.
Similarly, even Obama's most vocal opposition stops and stares just a bit overlong when they see him speaking.
What an odd situation.
Obama Nation or Abomination?
I recall the JFK era and, while Obama is no JFK - not by a far stretch, I might add - some similarities do exist, similarities that have more to do with grace and appearance than with character and substance. Put your prejudices aside and admit it: Not only is Barack Obama rather handsome, he moves and speaks with a natural grace unseen on the national stage in quite some time.
Pay just a little attention, however, and it becomes clear that Obama never really says anything. That is no mistake and it is not because he has nothing to say, either. He knows exactly what he is doing, rest assured. Obama puts the smoke with the mirrors of Jerry Brown's classic observation about politics: "A little vagueness goes a long way in this business."
In reality, everybody should be more than a little apprehensive about the prospect of an Obamanation in the making. Everybody. Black. White. Young. Old. Christian. Muslim. Jewish. Conservative. Liberal. Republican. Democrat. Patriot. ... Everybody.
Baracknophobia
Call it Baracknophobia, if you will. Some spiders will bite anyone, after all; therefore, anybody with arachnophobia has good cause for an irrationally obsessive fear of spiders. So, too, I suggest that we all could do with a good bit more Baracknophobia.
Some have mused that Obama may be the Anti-Christ. Perhaps. If ever he pulls out a blue cap (read Nostradamus), I may join them. After all, who else at this level of politics in the world today possibly could appeal equally to Christian and Muslim worlds? But, it needn't get that bad for an Obama presidency to be a really bad idea.
Christian Baracknophobes
Though claiming to be Christian himself, Obama makes little secret of his anti-Christian outlook. His mentor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, switched from being a rabidly radical and racist Black Muslim to being a rabidly radical and racist Christian, a pattern emulated by Obama himself.
During a speech in 07 Obama stated that "Whatever we once were, we're no longer a Christian nation."
What's more, consider the following quote from Obama's first little book, Dreams of My Father: "I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."
Obama's very real Muslim upbringing and adult influences should give pause to the most forgiving of Christians.
Muslim Baracknophobes
Almost the instant after confirming his capture of the Democrat Presidential nomination, Barack Obama appeared before the single largest Jewish lobbying organization, AIPAC, and pronounced,"As president I will never compromise when it comes to Israeli security." Obama also spoke of strengthening US-Israeli relations and giving Israel $30 billion to "ensure Israel's qualitative military advantage." Speaking of Iran, Obama stated twice that, "I will do everything in my power to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon ... everything." Obama told the assembled Jewish leaders that he learned about the Holocaust from a camp counselor at age 11 and claimed that his great-uncle helped to liberate Buchenwald.
Quite aside from Obama's obvious pandering mixed with groveling before the sworn blood enemies of Islam, Muslims have got to wonder about Obama's reported Muslim upbringing and just how such abject hypocrisy fits in with their belief systems. Result: Baracknophobia.
Jewish Baracknophobes
Deny it all you want, but facts are facts: the current conflict raging in the world is Jewish vs. Muslim and, though highly politicized and propagandized, Jewish vs. Christian. The latter fact is relevant only insofar as Christian America has been thrown into the breach and used to fight Judaism's war against Islam, just like always. If you are Jewish, this is just as it should be, of course - just as it always has been.
Obama's natural father was a Kenyan Black Muslim. After Obama's father deserted them, his mother married an Indonesian Muslim. They lived in Jakarta, where Obama was schooled in a Muslim School.
Obama participated in Louis Farrakhan's Black Muslim Million Man March.
Again, don't forget that little quote from Obama's first little book, Dreams of My Father: "I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction." Now you know all you need to know in order to be a Jewish Baracknophobe.
White Baracknophobes
From John Christian Ryder�s Wed Site,the following: "From their private rhetoric and their willing association with racists like Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obama and his wife Michelle can both be viewed as anti-white and anti-Semitic. Michelle Obama, who reportedly is not known by Chicagoans as a nice person, spoke in a campaign speech for her husband at Trinity United Church of Christ on May 5, 2008 in which she went on a diatribe against "whitey"�a term she used several times to describe America's "rich white middle class." She did not realize she was being recorded until her words made the Rush Limbaugh Show. Limbaugh noted that Michelle Obama's speech was videotaped by the church. But, Obama's damage control moved swiftly after the first rumors of his wife's "whitey remarks" hit the airwaves. The video of Michelle Obama's anti-white speech�which would have been good for private fundraising�was destroyed. When the Obama Campaign was queried by the media about the video of his wife's May 5 Trinity speech, the campaign confidently assured the media "no such tape exists.""
Obama's mother was White, but you never hear anything about her side of his family. Obama talks only of the African man who conceived Obama while wed to another and then abandoned him. From Obama's first little book, Dreams of My Father: "I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother's race." Also from Dreams of My Father: "I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites."
Google up some recent pictures of Detroit. Google up the FBI web site and track down the statistics on Black on White crime today (50 times as much violent crime from individual Blacks as from individual Whites).
Obama was a member of virulent racist, anti-White Rev. Wright's church for 20 years. Wright performed the Obamas' marriage. Only after a public outcry did Obama condemn Rev. Wright's "God damn America" sermon.
Then, consider the following from Obama's wife Michelle's graduate thesis: "There was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I am obligated to this community and will utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit the black community first and foremost." Nice sentiment from a potential First Lady, eh?
Obama has demanded that the "White community" invest more money in black schools and communities and provide this generation of blacks with "ladders of opportunity" not available to Barack�s generation. Excuse me? What did Obama and his wife get through school on - merit? Don't make me laugh.
Ever since that odious Supreme Court decision from 1955, Brown vs. Board of Education, my generation has given up much of what my forebears attained to achieve parity between Whites and Blacks. Yet, still a divide exists. There comes a time to admit that it is not lack of opportunity or funding and might just reflect a fundamental difference between the races.
Starting to feel a little nervous about voting for Obama? That's your Baracknophobia acting up.
Black Baracknophobes
Obama and his wife, Michelle, both are products of Affirmative Action education. In some ways, one might call them the poster for Affirmative Action. Affirmative Action, now that it has been institutionalized, putting the lie to its being emplaced for only a generation, to provide a leg up in compensation for past discrimination, really is a euphemism for the singularly liberal belief that "Blacks can't compete equally, so must always be provided an advantage."
The advantage? Handicap White America, of course. If I were Black, that fact alone would infuriate me about all who advocate and, even, argue for the extension of Affirmative Action, as does Obama.
The difference between Barack and Michelle is one of verbal stridency, with Michelle sounding overtly (and, thus, more honestly) anti-White and hostile all down through the years.
Michelle's Princeton graduate thesis even echoed her discontent when she described her White classmates and teachers as seeing her, always, as "Black first, student second." She also wrote: "My experience at Princeton made me far more aware of my blackness than ever before. I have found that at Princeton no matter now liberal and open-minded some of my white professors and classmates try to be toward me, I sometimes feel like a visitor on campus as if I really don't belong..." (Princeton Educated Blacks and the Black Community, M. Robinson graduate thesis, Princeton Univ.).
Well, when you took that affirmative action place that rightfully belonged to another, more qualified, student, what were you supposed to feel, Michelle? You started out over your head, stayed there and then chose to cast it in racial terms, not those of differing abilities.
Only when Barack began winning Presidential primaries did Michelle say, "Let me tell you something. For the first time in my adult lifetime, I'm really proud of my country." That leaves little room to wonder as to her outlook all those years before, doesn't it?
Even if the time is right for a Black President, Obama is not the right Black for the Presidency. This simple fact, alone, should make every Black step back and think twice about electing someone who so obviously is wrong and, equally obviously, is doomed to failure.
|
|
|
2
Comments
|
|
Baracknophobia Cont.
|
Posted:Jun 27, 2008 5:32 pm
Last Updated:Jun 27, 2008 6:41 pm
2456 Views
|
Old Baracknophobes
Liberals like Obama have three sources from which to finance their dreams of societal rebuilding: taxes, inflation and debt. Taxes under Obama will rise, to be sure - Bush already has guaranteed that with his profligate spending - but that will be drop in the ocean of his ambition.
Debt will increase, too - it has too, so long as we are running international trade deficits (now approaching one trillion dollars per year, too). However, the serious source of financing will be the same as that discovered by Bush: inflation. Obama simply will push the printing presses into overdrive, with each new dollar printed diluting the value of those that have gone before. Seniors, in particular, are locked into fixed incomes and established financial assets like annuities - all of which suffer the most from inflation.
In particular, the old should run screaming from the prospect of an Obama presidency.
Young Baracknophobes
Remember the debt I mentioned above, one of the prime reservoirs of financing for liberal ideologues? Essentially, debt of this magnitude turns our young into wage slaves for their entire lives, paying just the interest on the debt incurred for the benefit of the current generation. The young should, even more than the old, have a healthy dose of Baracknophobia.
Conservative Baracknophobes
The US Communist Party newspaper, Peoples' Weekly World, regularly prints articles praising Obama as the "new beacon of Socialism" in America.
During the recent primary campaign, Obama stated, "It's not surprising that small town (middle-class Whites) get bitter. They cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-free-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations." In this single rather remarkable statement, Obama admits that he is anti-religion, pro-immigration, pro-free-trade and anti-gun.
Is it any wonder that Obama's slim, 3-year voting record in the US Senate has marked him as the single most liberal senator in America? Aside from that simple fact, however, is the fact that Obama is the single, least-qualified person ever to run for President. His ten years prior to his recent junior Senator stint were spent as a community activist in Chicago, albeit in both city and state political roles.
The man has done nothing - absolutely nothing to distinguish himself. He quite literally is an empty suit.
Liberal Baracknophobs
In an interview, Obama called his mother, "the dominant figure in my formative years.The values she taught me continue to be my touchstone when it comes to how I go about the world of politics." Though Obama sometimes tries to evoke an image of his mother being just a conservative Kansan schoolgirl, the truth is that she was a radical cultural Marxist and dedicated leftist of the first order, one with a predilection for Black men so profound as to belie her own self-hating, anti-White beliefs.
Obama's mother's outlook was formed in Mercer Island High School, Bellevue, Washington, which has been described as being "a hotbed of pro-Marxist radical teachers" at the time she attended, one that had a Communist on its Board and several unapologetically-Marxist teachers on staff who advocated rejection of societal norms, rejection of Christianity and the family and assigned readings by Karl Marx. This is the fount from which Obama claims his "touchstone values" flow.
There is liberal and then there is Communist, the singular invention of Russian Jew Karl Marx. One is American as apple pie. The other is anti-American in the extreme. Yes, all these years of a so-called "conservative" like George W. Bush makes anybody look attractive. Problem is, Bush was the idiot- President. Obama, if his "touchstone values" truly are rooted in Communism, could be far worse.
Republican Baracknophobes
Even at a time when there truly is not a dime's worth of difference between the two major American political parties, Obama's "most liberal" voting record in the Senate places him in stark contrast with all Republicans, providing something more than the simple illusion of choice.
Democrat Baracknophobes
Though running as a Democrat, Obama's roots are Islamic, through and through. Born into Islam of a Communist mother, then abandoned by his Muslim father, Obama then was raised by his mother's second husband, yet another Black Muslim!
Patriot Baracknophobes
We've all heard the hoo ha about Obama not saluting the flag nor joining in with singing the National Anthem, not to mention his on-again-off-again wearing of a suit lapel flag pin.
Now listen to his own words: "As I've said about the flag pin, I don't want to be perceived as taking sides. There are a lot of people in the world to whom the American flag is a symbol of oppression. And the anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air and all. It should be swapped for something less parochial and less bellicose. I like the song 'I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing.' If that were our anthem, then I might salute it."
Obama voted for the recently-defeated McCain-Kennedy Amnesty Bill. Obama voted against a bill to declare English as America's official language. As a Chicago state senator, Obama sponsored a bill to ban all handguns throughout the state of Illinois.
Feeling a bit woozy yet, fellow patriots?
Consider the Context
The coming times are custom made for rabble-rousing ideologues like Huey Long, Adolf Hitler and ... Barack Obama. Bad times. Hard times. Brother-can-you-spare-a-$10-bill times. The American President will be the first to whom people look for their savior when the economy hits bottom (like a falling plane, the worst that has happened so far is that your luggage has fallen out of the overhead compartment and you have been distracted by figuring out how to wear the mask that fell down a few moments later and wondering vaguely how your seat bottom cushion can be made into a life preserver - it's the upcoming quick stop at the end that will do all the real damage).
The coming crash will be one of epic proportions. Regrettably, given what has been allowed to happen under Clinton and Bush the Lesser, the very best of men now would be able to do little except mutter solicitously and pass around the band-aids. Regrettably, Obama is not among the best of men. The opportunity he will have to accelerate his position of power will be unprecedented - something glimpsed only in George W. Bush's most addled of alcohol-induced visions.
America's real rulers have used Bush to emplace the most draconian police state ever conceived. It matters not that there has yet to be a wholesale roundup and slaughter of American citizens because the mechanism, procedures and organizations have been created and now are in place. Imagine what somebody with an above-room-temperature IQ might now do with this awesome buildup.
Obama may not be the Anti-Christ, but, if elected America's next President, he could well turn out to be the next-worst thing.
What Could Possibly be Worse?
On the other hand, if Obama loses the election, as I think most likely if the powers that be can keep the vote totals close enough to steal the election outright, just as they did for George W. Bush, then I think a Black uprising is very possible, particularly if America's economic picture has noticeably worsened in the meanwhile. Though the CFR chose Obama, previously I have stated that I do not think they believe they truly can control him. Therefore, they dare not let him actually assume power in America. Do they?
They may, however, choose the dramatic and simply have Obama assassinated by a "White Supremacist" patsy, a la JFK and Lee Harvey Oswald, either before or after the election, depending upon Obama's choice of VP candidate. Again, look for racial violence to break out should this be orchestrated.
Regardless, of what happens, I keep coming back to Lily Tomlin's classic, "Things will get worse only after they get much worse!"
|
|
|
2
Comments
|
|
Yuh gotta love this peace of SHIT
|
Posted:Jun 25, 2008 8:45 pm
Last Updated:May 25, 2024 9:46 pm
2265 Views
|
Bush Calls Zimbabwe Elections a 'Sham'
U.S. President George Bush is urging a strong international stand against the government of Zimbabwe, saying the presidential runoff election scheduled for later this week amounts to a sham. VOA White House correspondent Paula Wolfson has details.
President Bush, (r), speaks to the media during a meeting with UN Security Council permanent representatives at the White House, 25 June 2008
President Bush says the people of Zimbabwe deserve to have their votes count.
"Friday's elections appear to be a sham," he said.
Mr. Bush says it is impossible to conduct a free election when candidates are not allowed to campaign freely and their supporters face violence and intimidation.
"Yet the Mugabe government is intimidating the people on the ground in Zimbabwe," he added. "And this is an incredibly sad development."
They were his first public comments on Zimbabwe since opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai dropped out of the race, citing violence against his followers at the direction of President Robert Mugabe.
President Bush said the latest developments prove the election process in Zimbabwe is not free, fair, or legitimate.
"People there want to express themselves at the ballot box," he said. "Yet the Mugabe government has refused to allow them to do so. This is not just and it is wrong."
The tough talk came during a White House meeting attended by representatives of the U.N. Security Council.
President Bush said nations must join together to send a strong message to the Mugabe government. He praised the Council statement approved earlier this week which unanimously condemned Zimbabwe's government for a campaign of election-related violence.
The president then called on the African Union to continue to keep a spotlight on the situation in Zimbabwe during its upcoming meeting. He urged AU members to remind the world that the presidential election in Zimbabwe is neither free nor fair.
How the hell did this ASSHOLE get in if it wasn't fraud?
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.
This prick is still spouting shit an america is still buying it go figure.
Nothing more stupid than an American, so lets go Bomb Iran. Yeah that would be the American thing to do then scream like the fucking Joo's that everyone is against You. Yeah thats the fucking ticket. Poor little America, not a brain cell between You.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
Carlin,- Truer Words Have Never Been Spoken
|
Posted:Jun 24, 2008 10:59 am
Last Updated:Jun 24, 2008 12:49 pm
2259 Views
|
The Real Owners Of America
"The real owners are the big wealthy business interests that control things and make all the important decisions. Forget the politicians, they're an irrelevancy. The politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice. You don't. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They've long since bought and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the statehouses, the city halls. They've got the judges in their back pockets. And they own all the big media companies, so that they control just about all of the news and information you hear. They've got you by the balls. They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying lobbying to get what they want. Well, we know what they want; they want more for themselves and less for everybody else."
"But I'll tell you what they don't want. They don't want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don't want well-informed, well-educated people capable of critical thinking. They're not interested in that. That doesn't help them. That's against their interests. They don't want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table and figure out how badly they're getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago.
"You know what they want? Obedient workers people who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork but just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly shittier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, reduced benefits, the end of overtime and the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it. And, now, they're coming for your Social Security. They want your fucking retirement money. They want it back, so they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street. And you know something? They'll get it. They'll get it all, sooner or later, because they own this fucking place. It's a big club, and you ain't in it. You and I are not in the big club."
"This country is finished."
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
THE FIAT MONEY 3-STEP
|
Posted:Jun 24, 2008 5:34 am
Last Updated:Jun 24, 2008 5:36 am
2263 Views
|
CREDIT (step forward) DEBT (stumble) DEFAULT (fall)
It's been 95 years since the Federal Reserve System and its credit based money took over the US economy. Now, the United States , once the world's only creditor is by far its largest debtor. A report from the Federal Reserve in 2006 stated the US is technically bankrupt with $65.9 trillion in irreconcilable obligations. Currently, the US can only pay its debts by issuing new debt. Default comes next.
THE US CENTENNIAL CELEBRATION OF FIAT money
In 2013, in only five years the Federal Reserve System will celebrate its 100th birthday in America , the celebration of 100 years of bankers, financiers and corporate CEOs dismantling the productivity of America for personal gain.
It is my belief the next five years will determine America 's destiny. Once seen as a beacon, it is now distrusted and feared and rightly so. Those who bled this nation dry are still in control and the American people, America 's only hope, are not even aware of what has happened; and, if America is to be saved, there is not much time left in which to do so.
The odds aren't good and Americans, heavily indebted and addicted to credit, are still hoping the Federal Reserve can save them, much as a patient hopes doctors will provide the right medicines, not knowing the doctors are getting kickbacks from the pharmaceutical companies and are skimming prescriptions for their own benefit.
In fiat based economies, time is the enemy and 95 years have passed since fiat money was introduced into the US . In America and elsewhere time is passing and the clock is ticking and recently it's been sounding more and more like a time bomb.
It is hoped the election of a new president will save America . It won't. Democracy, once the hope of the world, is now its greatest disappointment. money-and fiat money at that-has subverted the democratic process everywhere; and today, in all nations, politicians from both conservative and liberal parties dance to fiat money's funereal beat-in a mockery of democracy's original intent.
DEMOCRACY-A CONTROLLED DANCE REQUIRING TWO PARTIES TO PERFORM
Nations, as well as people, can pass away in their sleep; and unless the American people wake up and wake up soon, their slumber will be the death rattle of what was recently the greatest nation on earth.
In just two weeks, on July 4 th 2008 , the United States will celebrate its 232nd birthday. But during its last 95 years, fiat money courtesy of the Federal Reserve System has steadily eroded the economic foundations of America . Once the wealthiest nation in the world, it is no longer. The cause is clear. So is the cure.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
Obama's Missteps or the more things CHANGE the more they stay the SAME
|
Posted:Jun 21, 2008 9:50 am
Last Updated:Jun 24, 2008 1:51 am
2406 Views
|
On his first day as the presumptive Democratic candidate for president earlier this month, Barack Obama committed a serious foreign policy blunder.Well not really a blunder as at least the house boy know's who his masters are. Reciting a litany of pro-Israeli positions at the annual meeting of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), he avowed: "Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided."
In promising U.S. support of Israel's claims to all of Jerusalem, Obama couldn't have picked a better way to offend the world's 325 million Arabs and 1.5 billion Muslims.However either he's to stupid to care or he just doesn't care because his masters don't care. Israel's 41-year stewardship of the Holy City has alarmed Muslims from Morocco to Malaysia. Upon seizing East Jerusalem in 1967, Israel razed the ancient Muslim Maghribi quarter to make room for Jewish worshipers at the Western Wall. Since 1991, Israel has steadily ratcheted down Palestinians' access to Muslim and Christian holy sites in Jerusalem. Most West Bank Palestinians can no longer worship there.
Obama's unnecessary promise deviates from nearly six decades of U.S. foreign policy that held Jerusalem to be occupied territory under international law. This long tradition was first broken in 2004 when President Bush acknowledged Israel's demands to keep its illegal West Bank settlements in a final peace agreement, including those around Jerusalem. Thus Obama, a Harvard-trained lawyer, would both scorn the international legal system's foundational principle - the inadmissibility of territorial acquisition by war - and echo President Bush, whose failed Middle East policies he has rightly deplored.
If Sen. Obama's Philadelphia speech on race was a model of courage and nuance, his AIPAC talk was brimming with the pro-Israel orthodoxy that typifies this year's presidential campaign. Like presumptive Republican nominee Sen. John McCain, Obama also backed Israel's so-called right to exist as a Jewish state.
How has it become an article of faith for U.S. politicians to support a state's privileging of one ethno-religious group over others? For what Israel seeks in recognition as a Jewish state is permission to permanently discriminate against Palestinians. Israel is, by law, a Jewish state. Its declaration of independence and basic law declare it to be so. But its population, excluding the West Bank and Gaza Strip, is not exclusively Jewish: 20 percent of Israel's citizens are native Palestinians, and another 4 percent are mostly immigrant non-Jews. Moreover, Jewish demographic predominance was achieved through the expulsion by force or fear of about 750,000 Palestinians in 1948. Israel denies Palestinians refugees - with their offspring, about 5.5 million persons - their internationally recognized right to return to their homes and homeland in order to maintain a strong Jewish majority.
According to Adalah, the Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel, 20 Israeli laws explicitly favor Jews. Israel's law of return, for example, grants rights of automatic citizenship to Jews no matter where they are from, while Palestinian exiles still holding keys to their family homes in Israel are denied this right. Religious parties play pivotal roles in Israeli politics, and Orthodox Jewish rabbinical courts govern matters of family law there.
Why should any American presidential aspirant promote ethno-religious supremacy in Israel? Don't we see a "Christian state" or a "Muslim state" as inherently discriminatory? Why don't we recognize the same in Israel's quest to be ordained a "Jewish state?"
Like Israel, we are a nation that combines a sincere commitment to democracy and a history that includes injustices. While we have never fully atoned for our dispossession of Native Americans, in facing the legacy of slavery, we have made an unyielding pledge to equal rights. A truly visionary American president might respectfully press a similar commitment on Israel, not endorse its urges for ethno-religious privilege. The SO CALLED terrible suffering inflicted on European Jews in the Nazi holocaust(insert eye roll here) does not entitle Israel to subjugate Palestinians.
Barack Obama whiffed in his first major foreign policy speech as the Democratic candidate. He may believe it necessary to pander to Israel's U.S. supporters in order to gain office. But he narrowed future policy options to those that would undermine international law, offend core American values and diminish our standing in the vital Middle East.
|
|
|
1
comment
|
|
the only CHANGE you gonna see from this Boy
|
Posted:Jun 20, 2008 11:50 pm
Last Updated:May 25, 2024 9:46 pm
2165 Views
|
Ooooo Sailor how many MORE friends did you say you had on board that Big ole Battle Ship? An could I see yo Coose Missle. Please Hunny pretty Please.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
Who wants to live in this NIGHTMARE world THEY are creating?
|
Posted:Jun 20, 2008 10:35 am
Last Updated:May 25, 2024 9:46 pm
2015 Views
|
I'm an immutable Conservative. I dislike change and I dislike SUDDEN change intensely. It's unacceptable to me. And I'm entitled to my opinion, just like everyone else; whatever their political leanings. That's not to say that my mind is closed to new possibilities. If new ideas could bring about a safer, more civilized world in which our can grow up to become normal, healthy, well-balanced adults, then I'm keen to hear how it can be done. And maybe I'd ameliorate my views in the face of cogent argument for change, provided it's workable and well-intentioned.
Unfortunately, however, and virtually without exception, the only change being promoted by our so-called 'leaders' and their mouthpieces in the Jewish-controlled media, continues to lead down the path of our cultural and moral disintegration and our eventual ethnic genocide. No one I know in my personal circle of friends, nor anyone I meet in the course of my travels, feels any differently. The broad mass of people DO NOT want it! This country is supposed to be a democracy, where the Will of the majority prevails. This Will, on the part of decent, ordinary, hard-working people like you and me, is being systematically circumvented by alien interests as indeed it has been now for far too long.
It's a curious 'democracy' indeed where a group of people who constitute just 3% of the population get to call all the shots and invariably get THEIR way over the wishes of the vast majority, and to the latter's very great detriment. The needs and wishes of true Americans (and Europeans in Europe) are being totally ignored and on top of that our noses are being rubbed in the dirt for our trouble. This is nothing new. It's been going on like this for decades, but only since the advent of the Internet have we been able to compare our various, disparate experiences and draw the only possible conclusion: the forces behind those who govern us, and these 'governors' themselves have 'done a number on us' that in its scope, depth and extent simply defies belief.
A thoroughly scientific Agenda was drawn up to destroy us over 200 years ago, but it's only very recently that we've even become aware of its existence. A powerful cabal of Jewish intellectuals, bankers, media magnates and politicians contrived a set of aims that would deliver us into their hands as their eternal slaves. Aldous Huxley exposed it in the 1930s, but at that time it was thought far too far-fetched to be deserving of serious consideration. But the intervening years have proved beyond doubt that writers like Huxley (all of whom were dismissed as "Alarmist" or "paranoid" or "sensationalist" at the time were in fact 100% correct in their vision of the future in which we now, through our collective indolence, are unlucky enough to live.
We have only days ago witnessed how far this usurpation of our voices has gone. The People of Ireland were the only ones permitted a free vote as to whether the provisions of the Lisbon Treaty (in part Europe's equivalent of our Constitution) should or should not be enshrined into law. They alone had the chance to express their wishes, for it was believed by the Marxists and New World Order reptiles at the core of Europe's administrative agencies, that they were the most Euro-friendly of all the 27 member states (which comprise some 500m people in all) and would surely give their overlords the green light for further Federalization and centralization of power.
For the sake of comparison, an equivalent scenario in the US would entail the government wanting to make a few tweaks to the Constitution which would never survive a full plebiscite of all our people because these 'tweaks' have far-reaching consequences for our freedoms. Perhaps Bush might want to eliminate the first and second amendments, for example. So rather than circulating ballot papers to every state and carrying out a properly organized popular vote, they simply print up enough papers for just one state alone - a small one, perhaps, chosen for its historical loyalty to the incumbent Administration, so the tables are heavily weighted in favor of a "YES" thereby enabling the changes to be forced through.
Incredible as it seems, this is what happened in Europe. The voices of 500 million people were gagged and the vote given to less than 3 million. And this notwithstanding that the result would effect the ENTIRE Union of half a billion people. This is the kind of blatant gerrymandering that is the hallmark of the NWO. THEY must get THEIR way above every other interest group. The base populations of the member states are just a nuisance; an obstacle to the Global Elite achieving their One World aims. The audacity of these malingering parasites simply beggars belief. And yet, if Ireland hadn't stood up and said "NO!" last week, those very same forces, who control our lives here in the US too, would have been suitably emboldened to try the same stunt here at some time in the near future. YOU better believe they would! The Overlords of Europe are just as surely working against the interests of European people to line their own pockets as our own traitors on Capitol Hill.
Any differences between the two groupings are entirely illusory - they are complimentary faces of the same power base whose ultimate aim is world domination and the eternal slavery of mankind. There will eventually be nowhere to run to escape from the hell-hole of a planet that these entities are fashioning in their own image. We must continue to wake others up. To hell with causing offense to some minorities; this mission is WAY to important. We are being shunted into a world-wide dictatorship with the Jews finally achieving all the goals they ever dreamed of. And you, me and our few remaining freedoms will be finished for ever. As Huxley observed, "There is no reason why a thoroughly scientific dictatorship should ever be overthrown." Today in the Western world, we are rushing headlong like lemmings toward that catastrophic rubicon. The remaining window of time in which to reverse this suicidal trend is vanishing fast. If we don't act with the utmost urgency NOW, then we're done for. We're dead.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
To link to this blog (rm_swallow22us) use [blog rm_swallow22us] in your messages.
|
|
|
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
71
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
Most Recent Comments by Others
| Ghosts from our recent tragedy spring at us. (4) | LoveHoochies
Nov 17, 2010 5:03 pm |
| There was a time (8) | Cockeyedoptmist2
Aug 10, 2009 6:17 pm |
| just pissed off at Aff (9) | itsall4you20053
Feb 15, 2009 8:54 pm |
| If You Americans weren't so close I'd think it almost Funny. (7) | alissatim
Feb 8, 2009 5:44 am |
| Crime and Punishment (3) | mmmlike2taste
Jan 13, 2009 5:41 pm |
| Who are you anyway? (5) | 4fntsy
Dec 23, 2008 8:11 am |
| THE LORELEI (3) | PixieKittySC
Dec 15, 2008 11:13 am |
| SURPRISE! (4) | mmmlike2taste
Dec 1, 2008 11:08 pm |
| Long live the anti occupation resistance in Afghanistan! (7) | rm_skyeone2
Nov 13, 2008 6:55 am |
| And a heartfelt thanks to Stupidest people on the planet (5) | BuffyBitchSlayer
Nov 12, 2008 4:23 pm |
| This is not a gun REALLY! Lets just call it a Party Favor. (4) | SolarPowered0
Nov 9, 2008 12:15 am |
|
|
